docwyte Posted March 24, 2012 Posted March 24, 2012 My friend is currently waving a stack of cash under my nose to buy my LS1 converted Porsche 944. That leaves me with the problem of replacing it if I take his offer. I'd like to compete in TTB/TTA, maybe TTC with an E36 M3. Are the C5 vette's the car to have in TTB/TTA? What about the boost buggies like the STI's and Evo's? Are they reliable? I need to drive the car to the track, as I don't have a truck or trailer to tow it, so the car needs to stay streetable/licensed and somewhat comfortable with A/C, radio, etc. Thoughts? Quote
TurboShortBus Posted March 25, 2012 Posted March 25, 2012 TTA: It's hard to argue with the C5 Mafia. TTB: A 100% bone stock C5 with only 255mm Hoosier A6s won the Championships at Mid-Ohio last September. This is probably as cheap as it gets, although the body roll was epic. If it helps, take the cost of engine replacement into consideration. You can probably find a used LSx for quite a bit cheaper than a Scooby flat 4. Plus, you have already tinkered with an LS1 engine, so it's not like you will have to learn about something new. Check prices for consumables (pads, rotors, wheel bearings, etc.) as well. Just my 2 cents... Mark Quote
bsytracklife Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 C5 Corvette or 00-05 Honda S2000 An M3, STI, or EVO will all also be very competative. The driver mod allways has a little to with it and what class you decide you want to run in. (AorB) Quote
Varkwso Posted March 27, 2012 Posted March 27, 2012 There is a at least one TTB C5 car newly built for the class running 245 tires (and no body roll) that will be interesting to watch compete. I think it will be class defining. E46 M3 will be a fierce TTB car also. Quote
Rob S. Posted March 27, 2012 Posted March 27, 2012 Wish I could magically squeak another 35whp out of my 4cyl. If so I think I could give the TTB C5 a run for it's money at Mid-OH. Given I can't I would say the top runners would be: TTA: C5 Z06 TTB: C5 base TTC: S2000 or E36 M3 Quote
ILIKETODRIVE Posted March 27, 2012 Posted March 27, 2012 Don't forget about the Mini Cooper for TTC. What...SRSLY Did you see what Cattaneo did in PTC at Mid-O? Quote
Rob S. Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Don't forget about the Mini Cooper for TTC. What...SRSLY Did you see what Cattaneo did in PTC at Mid-O? She ran a 38:3 in PTC and a 38.0 in TTC, which was DQ'd for not having 5 TT qualifying events. In TTC, DJ ran a 36.9 (1st) and Aaron ran a 37.3 (2nd). If her time wasn't DQ'd she would have been 5th out of seven. My bet is still on the S2000 or E36 M3. Quote
speedengineer Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 Don't forget about the Mini Cooper for TTC. What...SRSLY Did you see what Cattaneo did in PTC at Mid-O? I heard in another forum thread a couple days ago that her car was down maybe 50 hp at nats. Dunno how true it is, but perhaps she could have been even faster... from s2ki Just talked To Sarah's engine builder. Sarah's car overheated the week before in testing, They had to put a stock head and cam on it and they never retuned it. So it was down 50 or so HP when it ran at NASA Nationals. Quote
TurboShortBus Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 I was working PT/TT tech at the 2011 Championships, and I was at the dyno when Sarah's car was being tested on Sunday afternoon. I don't recall the exact numbers that it made, but I do remember that the car could have made a lot more power to reach the weight/power ratio limit of PTC. Mark Quote
boomn29 Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 My humble opinions. And every car I've listed has mounted up wins in it's respective classes - most at Nats but not all had the right build (or right driver/car) at the right time. TTC: S2000 or BMW E36 TTB: BMW E46 or CT9A Evo TTA: C5 Z06 Quote
Cooper93 Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 I think a 2002-03 Subaru WRX could be a very strong TTC car if build right. With mine, I'm about 1.5 secs away from the TTD track record at CMP (on street tires). I'll be shooting for the record in May (hopefully). I talked to Dan Walters some time ago about the WRX and he feels the same just as long as it's done right. Quote
kbrew8991 Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 We've got a quick one in TX, but we'll have to talk him into doing Nationals first to REALLY see Quote
D_Eclipse9916 Posted March 28, 2012 Posted March 28, 2012 I think a 2002-03 Subaru WRX could be a very strong TTC car if build right. With mine, I'm about 1.5 secs away from the TTD track record at CMP (on street tires). I'll be shooting for the record in May (hopefully). I talked to Dan Walters some time ago about the WRX and he feels the same just as long as it's done right. Id have to agree. While the M3 is limited to making power (this is Dj), I only made 229whp at 3176 minimum weight, nowhere even close to TTC power/weight, in fact closer to TTD. The WRX would have huge gains there and powering out of corners, although that wasnt really an issue with my car. Quote
Vinny Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 Can't say i would recommend any WRX for long term tracking unless your budget is big. 02-03 have the weakest transmissions, and depending on power level and how efficient the setup you'll go through an engine or two. Quote
jason Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 I think you will have a hard time beating a C5Z in cost and reliability per level of competitiveness. Quote
kbrew8991 Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 there are no standing starts in TT, and you can blow up anything if you're dumb Quote
Cobra4B Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 I think you will have a hard time beating a C5Z in cost and reliability per level of competitiveness. there are no standing starts in TT, and you can blow up anything if you're dumb Well... most of the C5 mafia is running around on 100,000+ mile motors and I don't know of anyone who's had a catastrophic failure. Shit... Mr. Perkins won Nats on 7 cylinders then went home and fixed it. Vs. Mr. Justin Matthews who's on engine number 76 in his Scooby. When it works the car is awesome, but the thing eats motors way more than I'd have the stomach or budget for. Quote
drivinhardz06 Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 so no vote for a DEF car modified to the hilt up to ABC? Quote
drivinhardz06 Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 there are no standing starts in TT, and you can blow up anything if you're dumb if you're ever looking for a good birthday or christmas present for scott, he can always use more pushrods Quote
jason Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 so no vote for a DEF car modified to the hilt up to ABC? LS6 swap into...anything. Quote
Cooper93 Posted March 29, 2012 Posted March 29, 2012 Can't say i would recommend any WRX for long term tracking unless your budget is big. 02-03 have the weakest transmissions, and depending on power level and how efficient the setup you'll go through an engine or two. Another nay-sayer (no offense). I was beating the snot out of mine for over 2 yrs with 300awhp and NEVER had an issue with the engine OR transmission. The reason people thing the transmissions are weak is because they modify the crap out of the 2.0 and then go out and do 7k RPM clutch dumps. Even the RA gearset can't hold up to this. Neither can the 06-07 transmissions (which are supposed to be as strong as the STi transmission) Another thing is TUNING. As long as you're around 11:1 A/F and no more than 25psi, you're golden. My A/F was around 11:1 - 11.5:1 and I was at 24psi on a VF43 with STOCK INTERNALS. Mods list: VF43 STi top mount 3" turbo back exhaust MLT 750cc injectors -and a DAMN GOOD tune from Todd at Motion Lab Tuning Zeal Function V6 coilovers So, don't do clutch dumps and tune, tune, tune!!! I'll be working with Jeff and Greg in the near future for a good, solid TTC car (my WRX). Quote
D_Eclipse9916 Posted March 30, 2012 Posted March 30, 2012 I'll be working with Jeff and Greg in the near future for a good, solid TTC car (my WRX). See you in the paddock (not on track ). Just playing. Seriously though, there is a reason people say these things. I use to track turbo awd cars. You either have a huge budget, or the car is going to be broke all the time. There is a reason people say Keep it Simple Stupid with track cars. The more complexity, the more its going to be a POS. And racing even makes a miata look unreliable comparatively. I come across so many wrx, evo, dsm owners that "think" oh well they are dead reliable in my HPDE for 2 seasons, ill prove you wrong! (I went through that stage too). Once they get into any sort of competitive environment the car just has constant issues and they lie to themselves that its reliable, it was "just that". People are telling you, because they either went through the experience themselves or know someone that did; we have heard this argument a million times. The single best move I made in my "track career" was to go to a much slower, simpler setup. I ended up rwd, NA with a bone-stock motor. And I am loving how reliable it is. Can't win a championship if your always working on the car in the paddock, no matter how fast you are. All that said, sorry for all of that, I did it, most likely youll still refuse to listen, so I wish you the best of luck. An AWD turbo car is definitely a good car to have for a class, but not necessarily good for your state of mind or driving. Quote
kbrew8991 Posted March 30, 2012 Posted March 30, 2012 the Texas Evo & WRX crowd laughs at you for that post Quote
Varkwso Posted March 30, 2012 Posted March 30, 2012 the Texas Evo & WRX crowd laughs at you for that post And so do all the part suppliers to the Texas Evo and WRX crowd.... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.