Jump to content

SN95 Mustang clarifications needed?


MHISSTC

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Glenn

    40

  • MHISSTC

    18

  • TurboShortBus

    14

  • mitchntx1548534714

    9

I don't consider that class a success. You seem to. As I said, 5.2 car per class does not eqaul success to me. HC is also only big on the west coast if I recall.

23 cars in CMC at the 2006 Nats is a success. For 2012, I hope we can equal that.

 

Not a success?

26 drivers this year at Nat's. And you point out CMC's greatest number was 23... five years ago.

 

I see only two drivers (of 26) from CA signed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't consider that class a success. You seem to. As I said, 5.2 car per class does not eqaul success to me. HC is also only big on the west coast if I recall.

23 cars in CMC at the 2006 Nats is a success. For 2012, I hope we can equal that.

 

Not a success?

26 drivers this year at Nat's. And you point out CMC's greatest number was 23... five years ago.

 

I see only two drivers (of 26) from CA signed up.

 

The HC 26 were/are spread across 5 HC classes. The CMC 23 of 2006 were in 1 class. That is a big difference.

I didn't realize HC was so populare in other regions. I havebeen corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would ST or GTS be a better example?

38 ST/SU drivers at Nat's in three classes.

62 GTS drivers in six classes.

 

Sounds good to me. Thats is double the number per class than the HC one you presented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on where you get your info from. The 4.6 PI motors were already 9.5-9.7:1 and the head swap takes them to 10.25-10.5:1 from the info I've seen on the net.

Given the following from Sean Hyland's book:

3.540" stroke

3.551" cylinder bore

0.036" compressed head gasket thickness

3.620" head gasket bore diameter

0.008" deck clearance

 

51 cc 1992-1998 2V heads

42 cc 1999-2004 2V PI heads

52 cc 1993-2004 4V heads

 

11 cc 1992-1998 2V piston dish

17 cc 1999-2004 2V PI piston dish

3 cc 1993-2004 4V piston dish (may not be accurate)

 

And using this calculator: http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

 

The compression ratio calculations for Ford 4.6L engines are:

1992-1998 2V, stock (11 cc dish, 51 cc) = 9.28

1999-2004 2V PI, stock (17 cc dish, 42 cc) = 9.66

1993-up 4V, stock (3 cc dish, 52 cc) = 10.21 (does not agree with 9.85 CR listed in specs)

 

1992-1998 2V bottom end (11 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (42 cc) = 10.52

1999-2004 2V bottom end (17 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (51 cc) = 8.62

 

1993-up 4V bottom end (3 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (51 cc) = 10.36

1993-up 4V bottom end (3 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (42 cc) = 11.97

 

But, recalculating per different numbers found at Sullivan Performance's website gives you:

1992-1998 2V, stock (10.49 cc dish, 52 cc) = 9.22

1999-2004 2V PI, stock (18.10 cc dish, 44 cc) = 9.26

1993-1998 4V, stock (2.66 cc dish, no chamber volume listed) = ?

1999-2002 4V, stock (4.54 cc dish, no chamber volume listed) = ?

 

1992-1998 2V bottom end (10.49 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 10.28

1999-2004 2V bottom end (18.10 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 8.41

 

1993-1998 4V bottom end (2.66 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 10.26

1993-1998 4V bottom end (2.66 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 11.63

 

1999-2001 4V bottom end (4.54 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 9.98

1999-2001 4V bottom end (4.54 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 11.27

 

So, these numbers can be all over the place, depending on whose information you use.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on where you get your info from. The 4.6 PI motors were already 9.5-9.7:1 and the head swap takes them to 10.25-10.5:1 from the info I've seen on the net.

Given the following from Sean Hyland's book:

3.540" stroke

3.551" cylinder bore

0.036" compressed head gasket thickness

3.620" head gasket bore diameter

0.008" deck clearance

 

51 cc 1992-1998 2V heads

42 cc 1999-2004 2V PI heads

52 cc 1993-2004 4V heads

 

11 cc 1992-1998 2V piston dish

17 cc 1999-2004 2V PI piston dish

3 cc 1993-2004 4V piston dish (may not be accurate)

 

And using this calculator: http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

 

The compression ratio calculations for Ford 4.6L engines are:

1992-1998 2V, stock (11 cc dish, 51 cc) = 9.28

1999-2004 2V PI, stock (17 cc dish, 42 cc) = 9.66

1993-up 4V, stock (3 cc dish, 52 cc) = 10.21 (does not agree with 9.85 CR listed in specs)

 

1992-1998 2V bottom end (11 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (42 cc) = 10.52

1999-2004 2V bottom end (17 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (51 cc) = 8.62

 

1993-up 4V bottom end (3 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (51 cc) = 10.36

1993-up 4V bottom end (3 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (42 cc) = 11.97

 

But, recalculating per different numbers found at Sullivan Performance's website gives you:

1992-1998 2V, stock (10.49 cc dish, 52 cc) = 9.22

1999-2004 2V PI, stock (18.10 cc dish, 44 cc) = 9.26

1993-1998 4V, stock (2.66 cc dish, no chamber volume listed) = ?

1999-2002 4V, stock (4.54 cc dish, no chamber volume listed) = ?

 

1992-1998 2V bottom end (10.49 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 10.28

1999-2004 2V bottom end (18.10 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 8.41

 

1993-1998 4V bottom end (2.66 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 10.26

1993-1998 4V bottom end (2.66 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 11.63

 

1999-2001 4V bottom end (4.54 cc dish) + 1992-1998 2V heads (52 cc) = 9.98

1999-2001 4V bottom end (4.54 cc dish) + 1999-2004 2V PI heads (44 cc) = 11.27

 

So, these numbers can be all over the place, depending on whose information you use.

 

Mark

 

Very nice work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...