Black Horse Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 In the same light as the Driveshaft Loop thread - current rules call for a "suggested" loop for retaining the torque arm. I do not propose specific requirements (such as a loop), but would rather the rules be stated that the torque arm have a secondary restraint (such as cable, chain, loop, etc.) to restrict its movements in the event of a failure. I agree with making safety a priority, should it be mandatory? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.