D Algozine Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 If someone feels that this is a worthwhile subject to call it's own, I will post a new thread. Would it be worthwhile to go to the effort of writing two seperate rules. One for AI and one for AI/X? It would seem some of the confusion including the strut tower thing seem to come from the wording as to which class. Just a thought. I know what a pain in the butt it is to write rules. Mark started it, I'm just running with it. Either write up seperate rules or be very explicit by having spcecific AI or AIX headings for each section to eliminate the confusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Horse Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 Sounds like a great idea to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onralz Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 I'm obviously an advocate of it just for the idea of simplification. I'm sure the original idea was just that. Simpy write one set of rules, but now people(me) are getting confused and it might be easier on the directors to just write one set per series. Thanks for bring it up Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardC Posted October 1, 2004 Share Posted October 1, 2004 It doesn't have to be a completely duplicate rule set. Under each existing rule item we could simply have an AI subheading with explicit rules for that item followed by an AIX subheading etc. Richard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.